By Natalie Frels
•
June 4, 2025
Click on right here to obtain discover. NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS AND FINAL NOTICE AND PUBLIC EXPLANATION OF A PROPOSED ACTIVITY IN A FEDERAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD DESIGNATED FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND D ate of publication: June third, 2025 The Texas Basic Land Workplace P.O. Field 12873 Austin, TX 78711‐2873 512-463-5001 These notices shall fulfill three separate however associated procedural necessities for actions to be undertaken by the Texas Basic Land Workplace (GLO). The proposed actions will help Hays County householders nonetheless affected by the imp acts of the 2024 Texas extreme storms and flooding, together with Hurricane Beryl (Beryl). REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS On or about June 4th, 2025, the GLO will submit a request to HUD for the discharge of Neighborhood Growth Block Grant – Catastrophe Restoration (CDBG-DR) funds appropriated beneath the Catastrophe Aid Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2025 (Pub.L. 118-158), as amended, to undertake initiatives beneath the single-family catastrophe restoration Home-owner Reimbursement Program (HRP) and Home-owner Help Program (HAP) for the aim of repairing, reconstructing, or newly setting up substitute single-family housing broken by the 2024 Disasters inside Hays County. From the HUD federal help, the State of Texas has allotted roughly $244,100,000 to HAP and $43,100,000 to HRP actions for distribution within the 27 affected counties, together with Hays County. The variety of initiatives funded in Hays County will likely be based mostly on the variety of eligible candidates and precise prices. To facilitate environmental assessment of the proposed actions, the GLO is implementing a tiered environmental assessment method in accordance with HUD rules at 24 CFR 58.15. The Environmental Evaluation Report (ERR) is tiered as an Envi ronmental Evaluation (24 CFR 58.36, subpart E) topic to legal guidelines and authorities at 24 CFR 58.5, 24 CFR 58.6, and NEPA evaluation. FINAL NOTICE AND PUBLIC EXPLANATION OF A PROPOSED ACTIVITY IN A 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND That is to offer discover that the Texas Basic Land Workplace (GLO) has carried out an analysis as required by Govt Order 11990 and Govt Order 11988, in accordance with HUD rules at 24 CFR 55.20 in Subpart C Procedures for Making Determinations on Floodplain Administration and Safety of Wetlands to find out the potential impact that Hays County single household catastrophe restoration H omeowner Reimbursement Program (HRP) and Home-owner Help Program (HAP) actions in wetlands and surrounding Federal Flood Danger Administration Customary (FFRMS) floodplains may have on the human setting. Inside Hays County, Federal Emergency Administration Company (FEMA) efficient maps embrace 26,763 acres (6.2%) within the 100-year floodplain Particular Flood Hazard Space (SFHA) Zones A/AE/AO, 11,808 acres (2.7%) within the regulatory floodway, and 0 acres (0%) throughout the Coastal Excessive Hazard Areas Zone V/VE. Zone X encompasses 5,689 acres (1.3%) of Hays County throughout the 500-year floodplain and 388,631 acres (89.9%) of Hays County exterior all SFHA-designated floodplains. Roughly 7,052 acres (1.6%) inside Hays County are designated as wetlands. This consists of freshwater emergent wetlands, freshwater forested/shrub wetlands, freshwater ponds, lakes, and riverine wetlands. The extent of the FFRMS floodplain will likely be decided at a site-specific stage utilizing the 0.2 p.c flood method (0.2PFA) or the freeboard worth method (FVA) when applicable. As well as, siting throughout the Restrict of Average Wave Motion (LiMWA)/Coastal A Zone will likely be decided on the site-specific stage. Actions throughout the LiMWA will carry the identical mitigation and safety technique as siting inside a coastal high-hazard space (Zone V/VE). The GLO has thought of the next alternate options and mitigation measures to attenuate hostile impacts and to revive and protect pure and useful capabilities and intrinsic values of the present FFRMS floodplain and wetland: (i) The explanation why the motion should happen in an FFRMS floodplain and/or wetland: Many current broken properties are situated in an FFRMS floodplain. (ii) Options thought of: Establishing extra enhancements was thought of. Nevertheless, the GLO decided that setting up/rehabbing fewer initiatives can be extra economically possible. Many low-income householders might not be capable to buy property that’s situated exterior of the FFRMS floodplain or wetland, and grant funding can’t be used to buy different land for the home-owner. Merely demolishing the house would go away the home-owner and not using a place to stay. Taking no motion would trigger householders to stay in unsafe and unsanitary situations, the place the house would proceed to deteriorate and be prone to future flood occasions. (iii) Mitigation measures: Considerably broken, reconstructed, and newly constructed properties within the FFRMS floodplain will likely be elevated to or above the FFRMS floodplain elevation, and the home-owner will likely be required to acquire and preserve flood insurance coverage if the parcel extends into the 100-year floodplain. Finest administration practices, sedimentation management, and/or erosion management will likely be utilized in building areas close to wetlands. The GLO has reevaluated alternate options to constructing within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland and has decided that it has no practicable various. Environmental recordsdata documenting compliance with Govt Order 11988 and Govt Order 11990, can be found for public inspection, assessment, and copying upon request on the instances and site delineated within the final paragraph of this discover for receipt of feedback. There are three main functions for this discover. First, individuals who could also be affected by actions within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland and those that have an curiosity within the safety of the pure setting must be given a chance to specific their issues and supply details about these areas. Commenters are inspired to supply various websites exterior of the FFRMS floodplain and wetland, various strategies to serve the identical mission function, and strategies to attenuate and mitigate mission impacts on the FFRMS floodplain and wetland. Second, an enough public discover program will be an necessary public instructional device. The dissemination of knowledge and request for public remark concerning the FFRMS floodplain and wetland can facilitate and improve Federal efforts to cut back the dangers and impacts related to the occupancy and modification of those particular areas. Third, as a matter of equity, when the Federal authorities determines it can take part in actions going down within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland, it should inform those that could also be put at better or continued threat. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The GLO has decided that the mission may have no important affect on the human setting, and th e GLO or its designee will conduct a site-specific environmental assessment of every HAP and HRP utility website to confirm this to be the case. Due to this fact, an Environmental Affect Assertion beneath the Nationwide Environmental Coverage Act of 1969 (NEPA) shouldn’t be required. Extra mission info is contained within the Environmental Evaluation Report (ERR) on file on the Texas Basic Land Workplace, P.O. Field 12873, Austin, TX 78 7 11‐2873 and could also be examined weekdays 9 A.M to five P.M. The file i s additionally out there for assessment electronically upon request. To request an digital copy, e mail david.camarena.glo@restoration.texas.gov . PUBLIC COMMENTS The proposed HAP and HRP actions will help single-family residence householders nonetheless affected by the 2024 Presidentially Declared Disasters. The help is urgently wanted to deal with unmet housing wants and supply protected and sanitary housing within the county. Due to this fact, as supplied by federal rules at 24 CFR 58.33(b), GLO is publishing the mixed Discovering of No Vital Affect (FONSI) and Discover of Intent to Request Launch of Funds (NOI/RROF) concurrently with the submission of the RROF to HUD. Any particular person, group, or company might submit written feedback on these notices or the ERR to the GLO Neighborhood Growth and Revitalization Program. Feedback could also be submitted to Ms. David Camarena at GLO by way of P.O. Field 12873, Austin, Texas 78711, or by e mail at david.camarena.glo@restoration.texas.gov . All feedback acquired by June 18th, 2025 will likely be thought of by the GLO. Feedback ought to specify which Discover they’re addressing. ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION The GLO certifies to HUD that Je t Hays, of their capability as Deputy Director, consents to simply accept the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an motion is dropped at implement tasks in relation to the environmental assessment course of and that these tasks have been glad. HUD’s approval of the certification satisfies its tasks beneath NEPA and associated legal guidelines and authorities and permits the GLO to make use of Program funds. OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS The actions proposed to help householders nonetheless affected by the 2024 Presidentially Declared Disasters, are urgently wanted to deal with ongoing impacts. Due to this fact, as supplied by federal rules at 24 CFR 58.33(b), GLO is publishing the mixed FONSI and NOI/RROF concurrently with the submission of the RROF to HUD. HUD will settle for objections to launch of funds instantly following the publication of this discover by means of a interval of fifteen days following the anticipated submission date or its precise receipt of the request (whichever is later), concurrent with the remark interval described within the part above. HUD will settle for objections to its launch of funds and the GLO’s certification solely on one of many following foundation: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the GLO; (b) the GLO has omitted a step or didn’t decide or discovering required by HUD rules at 24 CFR half 58; (c) the grant recipient or different individuals within the improvement course of have dedicated funds, incurred prices or undertaken actions not approved by 24 CFR Half 58 earlier than approval of a launch of funds by HUD; or (d) one other Federal company performing pursuant to 40 CFR Half 1504 has subm itted a written discovering that the mission is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of environmental high quality. Objections should be ready and submitted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Half 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD Catastrophe Restoration and Particular Points Division, 451 seventh Road SW, Room 7272, Washington, DC 20410 or by way of e mail to DisasterRecovery@hud.gov. Potential objectors ought to contact HUD to confirm the precise final day of the objection interval. Identify and Title of Certifying Officer: Jet Hays, Deputy Director, Program Integration, Texas Basic Land Offi ce.