By Natalie Frels
•
June 4, 2025
Click on right here to obtain discover. NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS AND FINAL NOTICE AND PUBLIC EXPLANATION OF A PROPOSED ACTIVITY IN A FEDERAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD DESIGNATED FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND D ate of publication: June third, 2025 The Texas Common Land Workplace P.O. Field 12873 Austin, TX 78711‐2873 512-463-5001 These notices shall fulfill three separate however associated procedural necessities for actions to be undertaken by the Texas Common Land Workplace (GLO). The proposed actions will help Hays County owners nonetheless affected by the imp acts of the 2024 Texas extreme storms and flooding, together with Hurricane Beryl (Beryl). REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS On or about June 4th, 2025, the GLO will submit a request to HUD for the discharge of Group Improvement Block Grant – Catastrophe Restoration (CDBG-DR) funds appropriated underneath the Catastrophe Aid Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2025 (Pub.L. 118-158), as amended, to undertake tasks underneath the single-family catastrophe restoration House owner Reimbursement Program (HRP) and House owner Help Program (HAP) for the aim of repairing, reconstructing, or newly developing alternative single-family housing broken by the 2024 Disasters inside Hays County. From the HUD federal help, the State of Texas has allotted roughly $244,100,000 to HAP and $43,100,000 to HRP actions for distribution within the 27 affected counties, together with Hays County. The variety of tasks funded in Hays County might be based mostly on the variety of eligible candidates and precise prices. To facilitate environmental overview of the proposed actions, the GLO is implementing a tiered environmental overview strategy in accordance with HUD laws at 24 CFR 58.15. The Environmental Evaluate Document (ERR) is tiered as an Envi ronmental Evaluation (24 CFR 58.36, subpart E) topic to legal guidelines and authorities at 24 CFR 58.5, 24 CFR 58.6, and NEPA evaluation. FINAL NOTICE AND PUBLIC EXPLANATION OF A PROPOSED ACTIVITY IN A 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND That is to offer discover that the Texas Common Land Workplace (GLO) has performed an analysis as required by Govt Order 11990 and Govt Order 11988, in accordance with HUD laws at 24 CFR 55.20 in Subpart C Procedures for Making Determinations on Floodplain Administration and Safety of Wetlands to find out the potential impact that Hays County single household catastrophe restoration H omeowner Reimbursement Program (HRP) and House owner Help Program (HAP) actions in wetlands and surrounding Federal Flood Threat Administration Customary (FFRMS) floodplains may have on the human atmosphere. Inside Hays County, Federal Emergency Administration Company (FEMA) efficient maps embrace 26,763 acres (6.2%) within the 100-year floodplain Particular Flood Hazard Space (SFHA) Zones A/AE/AO, 11,808 acres (2.7%) within the regulatory floodway, and 0 acres (0%) throughout the Coastal Excessive Hazard Areas Zone V/VE. Zone X encompasses 5,689 acres (1.3%) of Hays County throughout the 500-year floodplain and 388,631 acres (89.9%) of Hays County exterior all SFHA-designated floodplains. Roughly 7,052 acres (1.6%) inside Hays County are designated as wetlands. This consists of freshwater emergent wetlands, freshwater forested/shrub wetlands, freshwater ponds, lakes, and riverine wetlands. The extent of the FFRMS floodplain might be decided at a site-specific degree utilizing the 0.2 % flood strategy (0.2PFA) or the freeboard worth strategy (FVA) when acceptable. As well as, siting throughout the Restrict of Average Wave Motion (LiMWA)/Coastal A Zone might be decided on the site-specific degree. Actions throughout the LiMWA will carry the identical mitigation and safety technique as siting inside a coastal high-hazard space (Zone V/VE). The GLO has thought of the next options and mitigation measures to attenuate adversarial impacts and to revive and protect pure and helpful features and intrinsic values of the prevailing FFRMS floodplain and wetland: (i) Explanation why the motion should happen in an FFRMS floodplain and/or wetland: Many current broken properties are situated in an FFRMS floodplain. (ii) Options thought of: Developing extra enhancements was thought of. Nonetheless, the GLO decided that developing/rehabbing fewer tasks could be extra economically possible. Many low-income owners might not have the ability to buy property that’s situated exterior of the FFRMS floodplain or wetland, and grant funding can’t be used to buy different land for the home-owner. Merely demolishing the house would go away the home-owner and not using a place to reside. Taking no motion would trigger owners to stay in unsafe and unsanitary circumstances, the place the house would proceed to deteriorate and be vulnerable to future flood occasions. (iii) Mitigation measures: Considerably broken, reconstructed, and newly constructed properties within the FFRMS floodplain might be elevated to or above the FFRMS floodplain elevation, and the home-owner might be required to acquire and keep flood insurance coverage if the parcel extends into the 100-year floodplain. Greatest administration practices, sedimentation management, and/or erosion management might be utilized in development areas close to wetlands. The GLO has reevaluated options to constructing within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland and has decided that it has no practicable various. Environmental recordsdata documenting compliance with Govt Order 11988 and Govt Order 11990, can be found for public inspection, overview, and copying upon request on the occasions and site delineated within the final paragraph of this discover for receipt of feedback. There are three major functions for this discover. First, individuals who could also be affected by actions within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland and people who have an curiosity within the safety of the pure atmosphere must be given a possibility to specific their considerations and supply details about these areas. Commenters are inspired to supply various websites exterior of the FFRMS floodplain and wetland, various strategies to serve the identical undertaking function, and strategies to attenuate and mitigate undertaking impacts on the FFRMS floodplain and wetland. Second, an ample public discover program could be an necessary public academic device. The dissemination of data and request for public remark concerning the FFRMS floodplain and wetland can facilitate and improve Federal efforts to cut back the dangers and impacts related to the occupancy and modification of those particular areas. Third, as a matter of equity, when the Federal authorities determines it should take part in actions going down within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland, it should inform those that could also be put at higher or continued threat. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The GLO has decided that the undertaking may have no important influence on the human atmosphere, and th e GLO or its designee will conduct a site-specific environmental overview of every HAP and HRP utility web site to confirm this to be the case. Subsequently, an Environmental Affect Assertion underneath the Nationwide Environmental Coverage Act of 1969 (NEPA) isn’t required. Extra undertaking data is contained within the Environmental Evaluate Document (ERR) on file on the Texas Common Land Workplace, P.O. Field 12873, Austin, TX 78 7 11‐2873 and could also be examined weekdays 9 A.M to five P.M. The report i s additionally out there for overview electronically upon request. To request an digital copy, e-mail david.camarena.glo@restoration.texas.gov . PUBLIC COMMENTS The proposed HAP and HRP actions will help single-family residence owners nonetheless affected by the 2024 Presidentially Declared Disasters. The help is urgently wanted to handle unmet housing wants and supply secure and sanitary housing within the county. Subsequently, as offered by federal laws at 24 CFR 58.33(b), GLO is publishing the mixed Discovering of No Important Affect (FONSI) and Discover of Intent to Request Launch of Funds (NOI/RROF) concurrently with the submission of the RROF to HUD. Any particular person, group, or company might submit written feedback on these notices or the ERR to the GLO Group Improvement and Revitalization Program. Feedback could also be submitted to Ms. David Camarena at GLO by way of P.O. Field 12873, Austin, Texas 78711, or by e-mail at david.camarena.glo@restoration.texas.gov . All feedback obtained by June 18th, 2025 might be thought of by the GLO. Feedback ought to specify which Discover they’re addressing. ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION The GLO certifies to HUD that Je t Hays, of their capability as Deputy Director, consents to simply accept the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an motion is delivered to implement obligations in relation to the environmental overview course of and that these obligations have been glad. HUD’s approval of the certification satisfies its obligations underneath NEPA and associated legal guidelines and authorities and permits the GLO to make use of Program funds. OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS The actions proposed to help owners nonetheless affected by the 2024 Presidentially Declared Disasters, are urgently wanted to handle ongoing impacts. Subsequently, as offered by federal laws at 24 CFR 58.33(b), GLO is publishing the mixed FONSI and NOI/RROF concurrently with the submission of the RROF to HUD. HUD will settle for objections to launch of funds instantly following the publication of this discover by means of a interval of fifteen days following the anticipated submission date or its precise receipt of the request (whichever is later), concurrent with the remark interval described within the part above. HUD will settle for objections to its launch of funds and the GLO’s certification solely on one of many following foundation: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the GLO; (b) the GLO has omitted a step or didn’t decide or discovering required by HUD laws at 24 CFR half 58; (c) the grant recipient or different individuals within the growth course of have dedicated funds, incurred prices or undertaken actions not approved by 24 CFR Half 58 earlier than approval of a launch of funds by HUD; or (d) one other Federal company performing pursuant to 40 CFR Half 1504 has subm itted a written discovering that the undertaking is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of environmental high quality. Objections should be ready and submitted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Half 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD Catastrophe Restoration and Particular Points Division, 451 seventh Road SW, Room 7272, Washington, DC 20410 or by way of e-mail to DisasterRecovery@hud.gov. Potential objectors ought to contact HUD to confirm the precise final day of the objection interval. Title and Title of Certifying Officer: Jet Hays, Deputy Director, Program Integration, Texas Common Land Offi ce.