By Natalie Frels
•
June 4, 2025
Click on right here to obtain discover. NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS AND FINAL NOTICE AND PUBLIC EXPLANATION OF A PROPOSED ACTIVITY IN A FEDERAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD DESIGNATED FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND D ate of publication: June third, 2025 The Texas Basic Land Workplace P.O. Field 12873 Austin, TX 78711‐2873 512-463-5001 These notices shall fulfill three separate however associated procedural necessities for actions to be undertaken by the Texas Basic Land Workplace (GLO). The proposed actions will help Hays County householders nonetheless affected by the imp acts of the 2024 Texas extreme storms and flooding, together with Hurricane Beryl (Beryl). REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS On or about June 4th, 2025, the GLO will submit a request to HUD for the discharge of Neighborhood Growth Block Grant – Catastrophe Restoration (CDBG-DR) funds appropriated underneath the Catastrophe Aid Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2025 (Pub.L. 118-158), as amended, to undertake initiatives underneath the single-family catastrophe restoration Home-owner Reimbursement Program (HRP) and Home-owner Help Program (HAP) for the aim of repairing, reconstructing, or newly developing substitute single-family housing broken by the 2024 Disasters inside Hays County. From the HUD federal help, the State of Texas has allotted roughly $244,100,000 to HAP and $43,100,000 to HRP actions for distribution within the 27 affected counties, together with Hays County. The variety of initiatives funded in Hays County shall be primarily based on the variety of eligible candidates and precise prices. To facilitate environmental evaluate of the proposed actions, the GLO is implementing a tiered environmental evaluate method in accordance with HUD rules at 24 CFR 58.15. The Environmental Evaluate Document (ERR) is tiered as an Envi ronmental Evaluation (24 CFR 58.36, subpart E) topic to legal guidelines and authorities at 24 CFR 58.5, 24 CFR 58.6, and NEPA evaluation. FINAL NOTICE AND PUBLIC EXPLANATION OF A PROPOSED ACTIVITY IN A 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND That is to present discover that the Texas Basic Land Workplace (GLO) has carried out an analysis as required by Government Order 11990 and Government Order 11988, in accordance with HUD rules at 24 CFR 55.20 in Subpart C Procedures for Making Determinations on Floodplain Administration and Safety of Wetlands to find out the potential impact that Hays County single household catastrophe restoration H omeowner Reimbursement Program (HRP) and Home-owner Help Program (HAP) actions in wetlands and surrounding Federal Flood Danger Administration Customary (FFRMS) floodplains can have on the human surroundings. Inside Hays County, Federal Emergency Administration Company (FEMA) efficient maps embrace 26,763 acres (6.2%) within the 100-year floodplain Particular Flood Hazard Space (SFHA) Zones A/AE/AO, 11,808 acres (2.7%) within the regulatory floodway, and 0 acres (0%) throughout the Coastal Excessive Hazard Areas Zone V/VE. Zone X encompasses 5,689 acres (1.3%) of Hays County throughout the 500-year floodplain and 388,631 acres (89.9%) of Hays County outdoors all SFHA-designated floodplains. Roughly 7,052 acres (1.6%) inside Hays County are designated as wetlands. This consists of freshwater emergent wetlands, freshwater forested/shrub wetlands, freshwater ponds, lakes, and riverine wetlands. The extent of the FFRMS floodplain shall be decided at a site-specific stage utilizing the 0.2 p.c flood method (0.2PFA) or the freeboard worth method (FVA) when acceptable. As well as, siting throughout the Restrict of Average Wave Motion (LiMWA)/Coastal A Zone shall be decided on the site-specific stage. Actions throughout the LiMWA will carry the identical mitigation and safety technique as siting inside a coastal high-hazard space (Zone V/VE). The GLO has thought of the next alternate options and mitigation measures to reduce opposed impacts and to revive and protect pure and helpful features and intrinsic values of the prevailing FFRMS floodplain and wetland: (i) The explanation why the motion should happen in an FFRMS floodplain and/or wetland: Many current broken properties are positioned in an FFRMS floodplain. (ii) Alternate options thought of: Establishing extra enhancements was thought of. Nevertheless, the GLO decided that developing/rehabbing fewer initiatives could be extra economically possible. Many low-income householders might not be capable to buy property that’s positioned outdoors of the FFRMS floodplain or wetland, and grant funding can’t be used to buy different land for the house owner. Merely demolishing the house would go away the house owner and not using a place to stay. Taking no motion would trigger householders to stay in unsafe and unsanitary circumstances, the place the house would proceed to deteriorate and be prone to future flood occasions. (iii) Mitigation measures: Considerably broken, reconstructed, and newly constructed properties within the FFRMS floodplain shall be elevated to or above the FFRMS floodplain elevation, and the house owner shall be required to acquire and keep flood insurance coverage if the parcel extends into the 100-year floodplain. Greatest administration practices, sedimentation management, and/or erosion management shall be utilized in development areas close to wetlands. The GLO has reevaluated alternate options to constructing within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland and has decided that it has no practicable different. Environmental recordsdata documenting compliance with Government Order 11988 and Government Order 11990, can be found for public inspection, evaluate, and copying upon request on the instances and placement delineated within the final paragraph of this discover for receipt of feedback. There are three main functions for this discover. First, individuals who could also be affected by actions within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland and people who have an curiosity within the safety of the pure surroundings needs to be given a chance to specific their issues and supply details about these areas. Commenters are inspired to supply different websites outdoors of the FFRMS floodplain and wetland, different strategies to serve the identical mission goal, and strategies to reduce and mitigate mission impacts on the FFRMS floodplain and wetland. Second, an enough public discover program might be an vital public instructional instrument. The dissemination of knowledge and request for public remark concerning the FFRMS floodplain and wetland can facilitate and improve Federal efforts to cut back the dangers and impacts related to the occupancy and modification of those particular areas. Third, as a matter of equity, when the Federal authorities determines it can take part in actions going down within the FFRMS floodplain and wetland, it should inform those that could also be put at larger or continued threat. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The GLO has decided that the mission can have no important affect on the human surroundings, and th e GLO or its designee will conduct a site-specific environmental evaluate of every HAP and HRP utility website to confirm this to be the case. Due to this fact, an Environmental Impression Assertion underneath the Nationwide Environmental Coverage Act of 1969 (NEPA) will not be required. Further mission data is contained within the Environmental Evaluate Document (ERR) on file on the Texas Basic Land Workplace, P.O. Field 12873, Austin, TX 78 7 11‐2873 and could also be examined weekdays 9 A.M to five P.M. The report i s additionally out there for evaluate electronically upon request. To request an digital copy, electronic mail david.camarena.glo@restoration.texas.gov . PUBLIC COMMENTS The proposed HAP and HRP actions will help single-family residence householders nonetheless affected by the 2024 Presidentially Declared Disasters. The help is urgently wanted to handle unmet housing wants and supply secure and sanitary housing within the county. Due to this fact, as offered by federal rules at 24 CFR 58.33(b), GLO is publishing the mixed Discovering of No Vital Impression (FONSI) and Discover of Intent to Request Launch of Funds (NOI/RROF) concurrently with the submission of the RROF to HUD. Any particular person, group, or company might submit written feedback on these notices or the ERR to the GLO Neighborhood Growth and Revitalization Program. Feedback could also be submitted to Ms. David Camarena at GLO through P.O. Field 12873, Austin, Texas 78711, or by electronic mail at david.camarena.glo@restoration.texas.gov . All feedback acquired by June 18th, 2025 shall be thought of by the GLO. Feedback ought to specify which Discover they’re addressing. ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION The GLO certifies to HUD that Je t Hays, of their capability as Deputy Director, consents to simply accept the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an motion is delivered to implement duties in relation to the environmental evaluate course of and that these duties have been glad. HUD’s approval of the certification satisfies its duties underneath NEPA and associated legal guidelines and authorities and permits the GLO to make use of Program funds. OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS The actions proposed to help householders nonetheless affected by the 2024 Presidentially Declared Disasters, are urgently wanted to handle ongoing impacts. Due to this fact, as offered by federal rules at 24 CFR 58.33(b), GLO is publishing the mixed FONSI and NOI/RROF concurrently with the submission of the RROF to HUD. HUD will settle for objections to launch of funds instantly following the publication of this discover by a interval of fifteen days following the anticipated submission date or its precise receipt of the request (whichever is later), concurrent with the remark interval described within the part above. HUD will settle for objections to its launch of funds and the GLO’s certification solely on one of many following foundation: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the GLO; (b) the GLO has omitted a step or did not decide or discovering required by HUD rules at 24 CFR half 58; (c) the grant recipient or different contributors within the growth course of have dedicated funds, incurred prices or undertaken actions not licensed by 24 CFR Half 58 earlier than approval of a launch of funds by HUD; or (d) one other Federal company appearing pursuant to 40 CFR Half 1504 has subm itted a written discovering that the mission is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of environmental high quality. Objections should be ready and submitted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Half 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD Catastrophe Restoration and Particular Points Division, 451 seventh Avenue SW, Room 7272, Washington, DC 20410 or through electronic mail to DisasterRecovery@hud.gov. Potential objectors ought to contact HUD to confirm the precise final day of the objection interval. Identify and Title of Certifying Officer: Jet Hays, Deputy Director, Program Integration, Texas Basic Land Offi ce.